Evolution of Systematic Literature Reviews - from static to dynamic – a critical analysis

 Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Górnośląskiej - No. 19

How are systematic literature reviews adapting to turbulent times and changing the face of EBMnt? Through a critical literature review, we explored how traditional, static reviews, usually conducted as one-time projects, are transforming into dynamic, continuously updated “living literature reviews.”

Key findings: – Traditional, static reviews, conducted as one-time reports, are gradually evolving as technology advances and the number of scientific publications increases. – Dynamic approaches, based on the concept of living systematic reviews, meet the contemporary needs of updating reviews in real time.

Added value: Traditional reviews, once sufficient as one-time reports, are losing their relevance in the face of the growing number of new studies. Our research findings indicate the need to develop more flexible and dynamic methods for conducting literature reviews that can keep up with continuous innovation.

Tematyka: DynamicResearchMethods, EBMnt, EvidenceBasedMedicine, LiteratureReview, LivingReviews, MedicalEvidence, our research, RealTimeUpdates, ResearchEvolution, ScientificInnovation, SystematicReviews